If a larger bench is not formed, a constitutional crisis may lead to martial law
It is appropriate that a larger bench should be made, your judges are against your character, and they will protest if the flood victims' money is used for the battle of Lahore. Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's conversation with the media Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has said that if a larger bench is not formed, martial law may be imposed due to a constitutional crisis. It is appropriate to form a larger bench. Your judges are against your role. They will protest if the money of the flood victims is spent on the fight for the throne of Lahore. Talking to the media in Larkana, he said that the dictator's children are in PTI, Imran Khan was Pervez Musharraf's chief polling agent, and everyone whose past was undemocratic, is involved in PTI.
He said that these three judges should think about what is happening, at this time Pakistan's politics has become a hostage. A bench of 9 judges is now left with a bench of three judges. If a larger bench is not formed, such a constitutional crisis will arise that a God-willed martial law situation does not arise. This is not an election trial, but the Supreme Court's trial. Yes, the criticism of the Supreme Court by the judges is historic, but the distrust of fellow judges is also coming to the fore, and senior judges are criticizing the Supreme Court.
Your judges are against your character, if the money of our flood victims will be spent on the battle of Lahore, we will protest. Should they not be included separately, what messages do you want to send by sitting the judge who has serious charges against him? Cut, we have come up with guarantees on merit.
He said that there was a decision to express no confidence in the bench, he did not use the word boycott. Deciding on the current bench is against the principles of justice, the entire coalition government expressed no confidence in the current bench, I wish the Chief Justice would sit with the full court today, the decision of the full court will be accepted by the entire nation. Expressing himself in the National Assembly, he said that within 30 minutes of the verdict being pronounced, the Attorney General of that time took the position that the case was annulled by the majority of 4 judges against 3.
Some people said how did this happen? But then everyone saw that when the detailed decisions of the judges came, then everyone saw that the Somoto case was rejected by a decision of four to three. When the Election Commission announced the schedule of October 8 by the previous decisions and the Constitution, after receiving the response from the security agencies and the Ministry of Finance, keeping the security and economic situation in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in front. What did
But instead of the larger or full court, the Chief Justice made a five-member bench for the matter. It was not by the judicial practice, so the senior judge Justice Qazi Faiz Isa gave a decision or decision about the hearing of the automatic notice that the case of 184 III cannot be heard until the new legislation.
He said that these three judges should think about what is happening, at this time Pakistan's politics has become a hostage. A bench of 9 judges is now left with a bench of three judges. If a larger bench is not formed, such a constitutional crisis will arise that a God-willed martial law situation does not arise. This is not an election trial, but the Supreme Court's trial. Yes, the criticism of the Supreme Court by the judges is historic, but the distrust of fellow judges is also coming to the fore, and senior judges are criticizing the Supreme Court.
Your judges are against your character, if the money of our flood victims will be spent on the battle of Lahore, we will protest. Should they not be included separately, what messages do you want to send by sitting the judge who has serious charges against him? Cut, we have come up with guarantees on merit.
He said that there was a decision to express no confidence in the bench, he did not use the word boycott. Deciding on the current bench is against the principles of justice, the entire coalition government expressed no confidence in the current bench, I wish the Chief Justice would sit with the full court today, the decision of the full court will be accepted by the entire nation. Expressing himself in the National Assembly, he said that within 30 minutes of the verdict being pronounced, the Attorney General of that time took the position that the case was annulled by the majority of 4 judges against 3.
Some people said how did this happen? But then everyone saw that when the detailed decisions of the judges came, then everyone saw that the Somoto case was rejected by a decision of four to three. When the Election Commission announced the schedule of October 8 by the previous decisions and the Constitution, after receiving the response from the security agencies and the Ministry of Finance, keeping the security and economic situation in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in front. What did
But instead of the larger or full court, the Chief Justice made a five-member bench for the matter. It was not by the judicial practice, so the senior judge Justice Qazi Faiz Isa gave a decision or decision about the hearing of the automatic notice that the case of 184 III cannot be heard until the new legislation.
ReplyForward |
0 Comments