PML-N's look at the loot

Rumor has it that after the formation of PTI, the opportunities for PML-N to fight are brighter. After the narrative of Mian Nawaz Sharif, Maryam Nawaz and Pervez Rasheed, Muslim League has started to be called an ideological party. Then, if such a party, instead of self-confidence, considers it inevitable to include looters and electables in their party like in the past, then maybe these looters can get seats and thus remain credible, but the question is whether Such a real revolutionary change that should be the characteristic of the new government, i.e. the goal of the new government should be to heal the wounds of the people due to suffering and inflation and to free Pakistan from the global financial colonialist institutions that hold it accountable, but this goal should be looted or How to get a set adjustment from a batch containing lotts? Because what they were doing when they returned from where they came from, won't they do the same thing in the new government with their inevitability? Keep doing it. The sad thing is that while talking to the host Hamid Mir in Jio program "Capital Talk", Special Assistant to the Prime Minister Atta Tarar said that there should be seat adjustment from Parvez Khattak's party, PML-N should make seat adjustment wherever possible. He said that Shahzad Akbar and Shahbaz Gul are sitting outside after destroying the party and the economy. The question is that if Shahzad Akbar and Shahbaz Gul etc. have destroyed the economy, then did Pervaiz Khattak raise the flag of jihad against them at such a time? His adjustment from the party was a source of pride for the PML-N. Shoaib Shaheen, a member of the PTI Core Committee, who participated in the program, said that those who came on deputation in PTI went back. gone. As if Parvez Khattak and Company will give deputation to PML-N, then will these elements become angels or will they follow their habit with PML-N? Atta Tarar said that the PML-N leadership was subjected to the worst political revenge in the last four years. The question here is that during this time, did Parvez Khattak raise any voice against this revenge, besides stopping the hand of his party? India became independent with us, that's why democracy is stable there and because of this stable democracy, no one had the courage to impose martial law even for a single day, so that the term 'loots' was used in the post-independence politics. I couldn't imagine it. Although the term loot is a product of united India. By the way, the term loot is borrowed from the old term of horse trading, but it is said that this honor goes to a Muslim first in united India.

Parties that have an active organizational network in the country and a large number of capable and like-minded colleagues on the leadership side. The political atmosphere is in their favor, domestic and international organizations are reluctant to put a thorn in their path. Despite such favorable conditions and public popularity, if such parties do not consider it appropriate to take advantage of the objective situation and attack this political innovation of "loots" from the era of Iskandar Mirza, then how will democracy be stable? Mian Sahib, Maryam Nawaz, Pervez Rashid and other visionary Akabar Leaguers should close the doors of their party on Ibn Al-Uqtan, make such elements stand outside the assembly in the elections and make them believe that the parties that emerged from Ashirbad. The end is not always good. But the current behavior of Atta Tarar will strengthen the thinking of such Ibn al-Waqts that they are the need of every age. The misfortune of the country and democracy is that when

ReplyForward